Dec. 14, 2021 — Robert M. Califf, MD, plans to take a detailed take a look at federal insurance policies on opioid prescriptions in his anticipated second flip on the high U.S. regulator of medical merchandise, in addition to hold nearer tabs on the efficiency of medication cleared with accelerated approvals.
Califf on Tuesday fielded questions at a Senate listening to about his nomination by President Joe Biden to function FDA administrator), a job wherein served within the Obama administration. He additionally spoke about the necessity to bolster the nation’s capacity to take care of an sufficient provide of key medical merchandise, together with medication.
Members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is dealing with Califf’s nomination, had been largely cordial and supportive in the course of the listening to. Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA), the committee chair, and the panel’s high Republican, Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina addressed Califf in the course of the listening to as if he would quickly serve once more because the FDA’s chief. Both had been among the many senators who voted 89-4 to verify Califf in a February 2016 vote.
Califf “was previously confirmed to lead FDA in an overwhelming bipartisan vote and I look forward to working with him again to ensure FDA continues to protect families across the country, uphold the gold standard of safety and effectiveness, and put science and data first,” Murray mentioned.
Less obsessed with Califf was Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who was among the many seven senators who didn’t vote on Califf’s nomination in 2016.
Sanders objected in 2016 to Califf’s ties to the pharmaceutical trade and he did so once more Tuesday. A famous chief in conducting scientific trials, Califf has labored with many drugmakers. But on the listening to, Califf mentioned he concurs with Sanders on an concept strongly opposed by the pharmaceutical trade.
In response to Sanders’ query, Califf mentioned he already is “on record as being in favor of Medicare negotiating with the industry on prices.”
The FDA wouldn’t take direct half in negotiations, as this work could be dealt with by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Democrats wish to give Medicare some negotiating authority by means of their sweeping Build Back Better Act.
People within the United States are dismayed over each the price of pharmaceuticals and the widespread distribution of prescription painkillers that helped gasoline the present opioid epidemic, Sanders advised Califf. Many folks might be involved about an FDA commissioner who has benefited from shut ties to the trade, Sanders mentioned.
“How are they going to believe that you’re going to be an independent and strong voice against this enormously powerful, special interest?” Sanders requested.
“I’m totally with you on the concept that the price of pharmaceuticals is way too high in this country,” Califf mentioned in reply.
Califf was paid $2.7 million in wage and bonus by Verily Life Sciences, the biomedical analysis group operated by Alphabet Inc., father or mother firm of Google, in accordance with his federal monetary disclosure. He additionally reported holding board positions with pharmaceutical corporations AmyriAD and Centessa Pharmaceuticals PLC.
Bloomberg Government reported that Califf has ties to about 16 different analysis organizations and biotech corporations. Bloomberg Government additionally mentioned that in his earlier FDA service, Califf stored a whiteboard in his workplace that listed all of the actions and initiatives that required his recusal, citing as a supply Howard Sklamberg, who was a deputy commissioner below Califf.
“He was very, very, very careful,” Sklamberg, who’s now an legal professional at Arnold & Porter LLP, advised Bloomberg Government.
‘Work to Do’ on Opioids
Senators looped again repeatedly to the subject of opioids throughout Califf’s listening to, reflecting deep issues in regards to the FDA’s efforts to warn of the dangers of prescription painkillers.
There had been an estimated 100,306 drug overdose deaths within the U.S. within the 12 months ending in April, a rise of 28.5% from the 78,056 deaths throughout the identical interval the yr earlier than, in accordance with the CDC.
Califf mentioned he plans to give attention to what data the FDA conveys to the general public in regards to the dangers of prescription painkillers, together with a take a look at what the labels for these merchandise say.
“I am committed to do a comprehensive review of the status of opioids, early in my tenure,” Califf mentioned.
Califf indicated that physicians are nonetheless too fast to supply extra doses of those medicines, regardless of years of efforts to restrain their use. He mentioned he is aware of family members who got 30-day prescriptions for opioids after minor surgical procedure.
“So I know we have work to do,” Califf mentioned.
Concerns in regards to the FDA’s earlier work in managing opioids has led to protests from just a few Democratic senators in regards to the prospect of Biden nominating the appearing FDA commissioner, Janet Woodcock, MD, for the everlasting submit.
At the listening to, Sen. Ben Ray Luján (D-NM) raised the case of the FDA’s approval of the highly effective Zohydro painkiller. The company authorized that drug regardless of an 11-2 vote in opposition to it by the FDA’s Anesthetic and Analgesic Drug Advisory Committee.
Luján requested Califf what he would do if an FDA advisory committee voted “overwhelmingly” in opposition to recommending approval of a medication, as occurred within the Zohydro case.
While not talked about by Luján on this alternate in the course of the listening to with Califf, the FDA workers’s rejection of suggestions of advisory committees has been a rising concern amongst researchers.
The company final yr authorized aducanumab (Aduhelm, Biogen), a drug for Alzheimer’s illness, dismissing the recommendation of its Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee. That choice triggered the resignation of a number of members of the panel. The FDA workers additionally earlier rejected the conclusion nearly all of members of the identical advisory committee provided in 2016 on eteplirsen (Exondys 51), a drug for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Califf advised Luján he had finished current analysis into how typically the FDA workers doesn’t concur with the suggestions of an advisory committee. He mentioned the FDA takes a unique plan of action in about 25% of circumstances. In about three-quarters of these circumstances, the FDA workers opts for a “more stringent” strategy concerning permitting the general public entry to the drug, versus a extra beneficiant one as seen within the Zohydro, Aduhelm and Exondys 51 circumstances.
Still, Califf mentioned that when there’s an 11-2 advisory committee vote in opposition to suggestion of a product, “the leaders at FDA really need to take a close look” at what’s occurring.
Question on Accelerated Approvals
The FDA’s approval of aducanumab drew consideration to a debate already underway about conditional clearances generally known as accelerated approvals.
The FDA has used this path because the Nineties to hurry entry to medication for critical circumstances. The trade-off for early entry is that the company generally makes the flawed name primarily based on preliminary findings, and clears a medication later discovered to not profit sufferers as anticipated.
The FDA’s most cancers division is within the midst of public efforts to handle circumstances the place drugmakers haven’t been in a position to ship research that assist accelerated approvals of their oncology medication. In addition, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services introduced in August that it’s reviewing the FDA’s dealing with of the accelerated approval course of.
At Tuesday’s listening to, Burr grilled Califf about how he would reply to calls to vary how the FDA handles the accelerated-approval course of.
“Can you commit to me and to patients who may rely on cutting-edge treatments that you will not support efforts to narrow this pathway or raise the bar for drugs to be approved under those pathways?” Burr requested Califf.
Califf responded by saying he was “a fan of accelerated approval — for the right conditions.”
Earlier, in his opening assertion, Califf had mentioned his mom benefited straight from the accelerated approval of latest medication for a number of myeloma. Califf advised Burr that he had spent “countless hours with patient groups” and understands the necessity to pace the approval of medicines for critical ailments.
But the FDA additionally has to verify it holds up its finish of the discount struck with accelerated approvals. This entails checking on how these medicines work as soon as they’re marketed.
“We’re accepting that there’s more uncertainty,” Califf mentioned. “That means we’ve got to have a better system to evaluate these products as they’re used on the market. And I think there are ways that we can do that now. Technology is making this possible in ways that it just was not possible before.”
Worries in regards to the Medical Supply Chain
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) requested Califf in regards to the vulnerability of the U.S. medical system to disruptions of the provision chain. She raised issues about China’s dominance in antibiotic manufacturing for example. She requested if Congress might do extra to encourage home manufacturing of medical provides, similar to by providing tax incentives.
Califf advised Collins he shared her concern in regards to the US manufacturing of components utilized in each branded and generic medication. He mentioned he not too long ago has served on a committee of the National Academy of Medicine that’s analyzing provide chain points.
This committee will quickly launch a report with particular suggestions, Califf mentioned.
“We don’t have enough competitive entities in what’s become sort of a commodity business” of drug manufacturing, Califf mentioned. “So we need a number of steps to make the system more resilient.”